Amanda Repella, Author at Water Diplomacy Network Blog

Difficult Decisions and Dramatic Reforms to Solve China’s Water Problems? Scott Moore featured in International Herald Tribune

By Amanda Repella On April 3, 2013 · Add Comment · In Highlights

Peter Gleick on Water Wars and Rising Seas

By Amanda Repella On March 18, 2013 · Add Comment · In Highlights

Dr. Asit K. Biswas in The European, Business Times, and Water Challenge Blog

By Amanda Repella On March 13, 2013 · Add Comment · In Highlights

Water 2030: defining and initiating pathways to address the supply-demand gap

By Amanda Repella On January 24, 2013 · Add Comment · In Insights

Matching Risks and Rewards: researcher’s goals, practitioner’s decisions, and flood risk management practices

By Amanda Repella On January 20, 2013 · 1 Comment · In Insights

Flood risk management seeks to prevent and mitigate disastrous outcomes from flood events through built infrastructure, management of control devices, land-use planning, flood prediction and emergency management planning. Researchers from NCAR and the University of Colorado interviewed decision makers at multiple levels and scientists who study flood risks and prediction to better understand how flood risk research questions are studied and how actual risk management decisions are made to better inform the researchers who seek to provide the information that will improve flood risk management decision making. However, while scientists often assume that more specific scientific information that reduces uncertainty about flood timing or magnitude will lead to better flood prediction and flood management policies, the diverse group of practitioners involved in the policy and management decision process may need different information that better addresses the realities of their decision making environment.

Narrative of Complacency: international donor perceptions and narratives helped to perpetuate irrigation system problems in Indonesia

By Amanda Repella On January 7, 2013 · Add Comment · In Insights

International donors promote the widespread adoption of various policy trends and are able to influence policy with developing countries through funding schemes. The perceptions of international donors and dominant policy narratives may not align with the development conditions at the local or national levels, which can lead to ineffective development funding and perpetuate a cycle of ineffective policy and programs. Dr. Diana Suhardiman of the International Water Management Institute and Dr. Peter Mollinga of the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London, examined the international donors and dominant policy narratives over the past five decades in Indonesian irrigation policy and used this detailed case study to illustrate that when national policies are strongly shaped by international trends, there is a potential that assumptions about causal mechanisms or organizational motivations may lead to financial and institutional arrangements that cannot produce the desired outcome and may perpetuate or exacerbate a negative result.

AquaPedia — a new water database to connect existing resources and build or contribute new knowledge

By Amanda Repella On February 1, 2012 · Add Comment · In Water Diplomacy Updates

Difficult Decisions and Dramatic Reforms to Solve China’s Water Problems? Scott Moore featured in International Herald Tribune

Peter Gleick on Water Wars and Rising Seas

Dr. Asit K. Biswas in The European, Business Times, and Water Challenge Blog

Water 2030: defining and initiating pathways to address the supply-demand gap

Matching Risks and Rewards: researcher’s goals, practitioner’s decisions, and flood risk management practices

Narrative of Complacency: international donor perceptions and narratives helped to perpetuate irrigation system problems in Indonesia

AquaPedia — a new water database to connect existing resources and build or contribute new knowledge

Archives